๐Ÿ”—
Productivity Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits โ˜… Editor's pick

Make

Visual automation platform connecting 3,000+ apps, with AI agents and a drag-and-drop canvas instead of a linear trigger-and-action list.

Updated 2026-08-02

8.7
AI Score / 10
Visit Make
Quick answer

Yes, within limits. Make runs a free tier with paid plans above it.

Listed pricing: Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits.

Pricing verified 2026-08-02 Is it free? Pricing Is it worth it?
Best for
Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.

Overview

Make describes itself as "The visual AI automation platform", and the promise on its homepage is to "Connect any app, data source, or AI model. Build and manage automations and AI agents, visually, in code, or with a prompt." It claims 3,000+ pre-built apps, 400+ of them AI integrations, and says it is trusted by over 400,000 organisations across 200+ countries. On top of the classic automation canvas sit Make AI Agents, Make Grid for managing an automation estate, and a Make MCP Server for connecting an AI to real business actions.

The canvas is the actual differentiator. Where a linear builder gives you a trigger and an ordered list of actions, Make gives you a diagram with routers that branch, error handlers that catch, and modules you can rearrange spatially. That suits work with real conditional logic. It also means the learning curve is steeper than a form-based builder, which is the trade being made.

My read: read the pricing carefully, because the headline number is the smallest rung of a slider. Make bills in credits, and its definition is precise: "Each module action in your scenario, like adding a Google Sheet row or fetching Gmail account data, counts as one credit." Free gives 1,000 credits a month with two active scenarios, a 15-minute minimum interval between runs, a 5-minute execution ceiling, 5 MB file size, 512 MB data transfer and 7-day log retention. Core starts at $9 a month, Pro at $16 and Teams at $29, but every one of those prices is for the 10,000-credit rung, and the slider moves the price up from there. A scenario that touches six modules per record burns six credits per record, so 10,000 credits is a smaller allowance than it sounds. Routers and error handlers costing nothing is a genuine design detail worth knowing before you build.

Is Make free?

Yes, within limits. Make runs a free tier with paid plans above it.

What the free tier covers: Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.

Listed pricing: Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits.

Pricing verified . That is the date the plans were last re-checked against the vendor's own pages, not today's date. Confirm on the official site before you pay.

What the free tier leaves out

Read straight off the plan list below. Vendors move features between tiers, so check the current split before you pay.

  • Core From $9/mo at 10,000 credits Unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling granularity, increased data limits, API access. Price rises with the credit slider.
  • Pro From $16/mo at 10,000 credits Everything in Core plus priority execution, custom variables and full-text log search.
  • Teams From $29/mo at 10,000 credits Everything in Pro plus team roles and scenario template sharing.
  • Enterprise Custom Custom functions, enterprise app integrations, 24/7 support, Value Engineering access, overage protection, advanced security.

Make pricing

Free $0

1,000 credits/mo, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum interval between scheduled runs, 5-minute maximum execution time, 5 MB file size limit, 512 MB data transfer, 7-day execution log storage.

Core From $9/mo at 10,000 credits

Unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling granularity, increased data limits, API access. Price rises with the credit slider.

Pro From $16/mo at 10,000 credits

Everything in Core plus priority execution, custom variables and full-text log search.

Teams From $29/mo at 10,000 credits

Everything in Pro plus team roles and scenario template sharing.

Enterprise Custom

Custom functions, enterprise app integrations, 24/7 support, Value Engineering access, overage protection, advanced security.

One plan carries no published number: Enterprise, recorded as “Custom”. Nothing is estimated in its place. The vendor's own pricing page is the only source for those figures.

Pricing verified . That is the date the plans were last re-checked against the vendor's own pages, not today's date. Confirm on the official site before you pay.

Is Make worth it?

Worth it for Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.

You can test that on the free tier before paying anything. The recorded trade-offs are listed below, and any one of them can settle the question on its own.

The 8.7/10 AI Score is an editorial read of published capability, price and shipping pace. Nobody here has hands-on hours with Make. How we verify.

Worth it if

The strengths recorded against this entry.

  • Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
  • Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
  • 3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
  • Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
  • Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

Not worth it if

Any one of these blocks your use case.

  • Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
  • The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
  • Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
  • The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
  • Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be

What sets Make apart

  • Visual canvas with routers and error handlers, so branching logic is drawn rather than chained
  • Routers and error-handler modules consume zero credits, which changes how you structure a scenario
  • 3,000+ pre-built app integrations including 400+ AI app integrations
  • Make AI Agents and a Make MCP Server connect agents to real actions across those apps
  • Free tier runs real scenarios rather than acting as a trial

Key features

Visual scenario canvas

Automations are drawn as a diagram of connected modules rather than an ordered list, which is what makes branching and conditional flows readable when they get complicated.

Routers and error handlers at zero credit cost

Make states that error handler modules and routers consume zero credits. That makes defensive design and branching effectively free, and it should shape how a scenario is structured.

3,000+ app integrations

Pre-built connectors across 3,000+ apps, with 400+ described specifically as AI app integrations. Breadth of connectors is the thing that decides whether an automation platform can do the job at all.

Make AI Agents

Make's framing is agents that "take action and orchestrate complex workflows across 3,000+ apps", with the agent's behaviour visible on the same canvas as the rest of the automation.

Make MCP Server

Connects an AI to real business actions through Make's existing app connections, which is the bridge between an assistant that can talk about a system and one that can change it.

Make Grid

Management layer for the whole automation estate, aimed at organisations that have gone past a handful of scenarios and need to see what is running where.

How it compares

Compare head-to-head

Comparison explorer Put Make up against any three tools Opens with Make already loaded. Add up to three more from the full index and read pricing, features, pros and cons in one table. โ†’

Related reading

Ready to try Make?

Head to the official site to start with Make โ€” pricing and plans are listed above.

Visit Make
โ† More Productivity tools