Make
Visual automation platform connecting 3,000+ apps, with AI agents and a drag-and-drop canvas instead of a linear trigger-and-action list.
Updated 2026-08-02
Yes, within limits. Make runs a free tier with paid plans above it.
Listed pricing: Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits.
Overview
Make describes itself as "The visual AI automation platform", and the promise on its homepage is to "Connect any app, data source, or AI model. Build and manage automations and AI agents, visually, in code, or with a prompt." It claims 3,000+ pre-built apps, 400+ of them AI integrations, and says it is trusted by over 400,000 organisations across 200+ countries. On top of the classic automation canvas sit Make AI Agents, Make Grid for managing an automation estate, and a Make MCP Server for connecting an AI to real business actions.
The canvas is the actual differentiator. Where a linear builder gives you a trigger and an ordered list of actions, Make gives you a diagram with routers that branch, error handlers that catch, and modules you can rearrange spatially. That suits work with real conditional logic. It also means the learning curve is steeper than a form-based builder, which is the trade being made.
My read: read the pricing carefully, because the headline number is the smallest rung of a slider. Make bills in credits, and its definition is precise: "Each module action in your scenario, like adding a Google Sheet row or fetching Gmail account data, counts as one credit." Free gives 1,000 credits a month with two active scenarios, a 15-minute minimum interval between runs, a 5-minute execution ceiling, 5 MB file size, 512 MB data transfer and 7-day log retention. Core starts at $9 a month, Pro at $16 and Teams at $29, but every one of those prices is for the 10,000-credit rung, and the slider moves the price up from there. A scenario that touches six modules per record burns six credits per record, so 10,000 credits is a smaller allowance than it sounds. Routers and error handlers costing nothing is a genuine design detail worth knowing before you build.
Is Make free?
Yes, within limits. Make runs a free tier with paid plans above it.
What the free tier covers: Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.
Listed pricing: Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits.
Pricing verified . That is the date the plans were last re-checked against the vendor's own pages, not today's date. Confirm on the official site before you pay.
What the free tier leaves out
Read straight off the plan list below. Vendors move features between tiers, so check the current split before you pay.
- Core From $9/mo at 10,000 credits Unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling granularity, increased data limits, API access. Price rises with the credit slider.
- Pro From $16/mo at 10,000 credits Everything in Core plus priority execution, custom variables and full-text log search.
- Teams From $29/mo at 10,000 credits Everything in Pro plus team roles and scenario template sharing.
- Enterprise Custom Custom functions, enterprise app integrations, 24/7 support, Value Engineering access, overage protection, advanced security.
Make pricing
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 credits/mo, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum interval between scheduled runs, 5-minute maximum execution time, 5 MB file size limit, 512 MB data transfer, 7-day execution log storage. |
| Core | From $9/mo at 10,000 credits | Unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling granularity, increased data limits, API access. Price rises with the credit slider. |
| Pro | From $16/mo at 10,000 credits | Everything in Core plus priority execution, custom variables and full-text log search. |
| Teams | From $29/mo at 10,000 credits | Everything in Pro plus team roles and scenario template sharing. |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom functions, enterprise app integrations, 24/7 support, Value Engineering access, overage protection, advanced security. |
1,000 credits/mo, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute minimum interval between scheduled runs, 5-minute maximum execution time, 5 MB file size limit, 512 MB data transfer, 7-day execution log storage.
Unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling granularity, increased data limits, API access. Price rises with the credit slider.
Everything in Core plus priority execution, custom variables and full-text log search.
Everything in Pro plus team roles and scenario template sharing.
Custom functions, enterprise app integrations, 24/7 support, Value Engineering access, overage protection, advanced security.
One plan carries no published number: Enterprise, recorded as “Custom”. Nothing is estimated in its place. The vendor's own pricing page is the only source for those figures.
Pricing verified . That is the date the plans were last re-checked against the vendor's own pages, not today's date. Confirm on the official site before you pay.
Is Make worth it?
Worth it for Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
You can test that on the free tier before paying anything. The recorded trade-offs are listed below, and any one of them can settle the question on its own.
The 8.7/10 AI Score is an editorial read of published capability, price and shipping pace. Nobody here has hands-on hours with Make. How we verify.
Worth it if
The strengths recorded against this entry.
- Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
- Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
- 3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
- Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
- Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier
Not worth it if
Any one of these blocks your use case.
- Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
- The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
- Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
- The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
- Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be
What sets Make apart
- Visual canvas with routers and error handlers, so branching logic is drawn rather than chained
- Routers and error-handler modules consume zero credits, which changes how you structure a scenario
- 3,000+ pre-built app integrations including 400+ AI app integrations
- Make AI Agents and a Make MCP Server connect agents to real actions across those apps
- Free tier runs real scenarios rather than acting as a trial
Key features
Visual scenario canvas
Automations are drawn as a diagram of connected modules rather than an ordered list, which is what makes branching and conditional flows readable when they get complicated.
Routers and error handlers at zero credit cost
Make states that error handler modules and routers consume zero credits. That makes defensive design and branching effectively free, and it should shape how a scenario is structured.
3,000+ app integrations
Pre-built connectors across 3,000+ apps, with 400+ described specifically as AI app integrations. Breadth of connectors is the thing that decides whether an automation platform can do the job at all.
Make AI Agents
Make's framing is agents that "take action and orchestrate complex workflows across 3,000+ apps", with the agent's behaviour visible on the same canvas as the rest of the automation.
Make MCP Server
Connects an AI to real business actions through Make's existing app connections, which is the bridge between an assistant that can talk about a system and one that can change it.
Make Grid
Management layer for the whole automation estate, aimed at organisations that have gone past a handful of scenarios and need to see what is running where.
How it compares
| Tool | Best for | Pricing | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make | Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps. | Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits | 8.7/10 |
| Zapier vs Zapier โ | Teams that need to connect many SaaS apps and build automations from a plain-English description instead of manual setup. | Freemium | 8.9/10 |
| n8n vs n8n โ | Technically comfortable teams who want to self-host their automation and build AI agents that chain LLMs with operational tools. | Freemium | 8.7/10 |
| Notion AI vs Notion AI โ | Notion users who want an assistant that already knows their pages, databases, and documents for summaries and answers. | From $10/mo | 9/10 |
| OpenClaw vs OpenClaw โ | Technically comfortable users who want a self-hosted AI agent handling email, calendar, browser, and files from a phone messaging app. | Free (Open Source) | 8.6/10 |
Compare head-to-head
Related reading
Claude Eval Escapes: An 8-Day Disclosure Clock
Anthropic suspended the cyber evals July 23, notified affected organizations July 27, published July 31. What those dates settle and what they don't.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash API: Responses, Codex, Agent Setup
DeepSeek opened the V4-Flash public beta on July 31, 2026 with a native Responses API. Model ID, server-side state, Codex setup, and the agent claim.
Three Claude Eval Escapes in 141,000 Runs
Anthropic's July 30 disclosure came out of a retrospective sweep of 141,000+ cyber eval runs. The chronology, the arithmetic, and what it predicts.
Ready to try Make?
Head to the official site to start with Make โ pricing and plans are listed above.
Visit Make


