Productivity · Head-to-head
Make vs tl;dv
Make (freemium, AI Score 8.7/10) vs tl;dv (freemium, AI Score 8.7/10). Side-by-side pricing, features, pros and cons, and which to pick.
The verdict
Pick Make if…
- →your primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
- →you need: agents
Pick tl;dv if…
- →your primary use case is teams recording zoom, meet, or teams calls who want unlimited free transcription plus automatic crm logging for sales conversations.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Make | tl;dv |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Headline pricing | Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits | Freemium — Free unlimited recording; Pro from $20/user/mo |
| Free tier | Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers. | Unlimited meeting recordings and transcriptions with AI summaries and timestamped highlights |
| AI Score | 8.7/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Best for | Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps. | Teams recording Zoom, Meet, or Teams calls who want unlimited free transcription plus automatic CRM logging for sales conversations. |
| Editor's pick | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Use cases | productivity agents marketing | productivity marketing |
| Date added | 2026-08-02 | 2026-05-01 |
Pros and cons
🔗
Make
Productivity · freemium
Pros
- ✓Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
- ✓Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
- ✓3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
- ✓Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
- ✓Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier
Cons
- ×Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
- ×The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
- ×Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
- ×The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
- ×Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be
tl;dv
Productivity · freemium
Pros
- ✓Genuinely unlimited free tier — no minutes cap on recordings or transcriptions, unlike most competitors
- ✓Timestamped highlights let you clip and share specific moments instead of sending full recordings
- ✓Strong CRM integrations auto-log meeting notes to Salesforce and HubSpot without manual entry
- ✓Multi-meeting intelligence surfaces patterns across your conversation history, not just individual calls
Cons
- ×Pro tier at $20/user/mo is pricier than Otter.ai or Fireflies.ai for the first paid step
- ×Meeting bot joining calls can feel intrusive to external participants unfamiliar with AI notetakers
- ×Transcription accuracy drops with heavy accents, background noise, or overlapping speakers
- ×Advanced analytics and coaching features locked behind the $59/mo Business tier
Related comparisons
Updated 2026-08-02. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.