Productivity ยท Head-to-head

Fathom vs Make

Fathom (freemium, AI Score 8.8/10) vs Make (freemium, AI Score 8.7/10). Side-by-side pricing, features, pros and cons, and which to pick.

The verdict

Pick Fathom ifโ€ฆ
  • โ†’your primary use case is individuals and sales teams who want unlimited free meeting transcription without a bot visibly joining the call.
Try Fathom โ†’
Pick Make ifโ€ฆ
  • โ†’your primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
  • โ†’you need: marketing
Try Make โ†’

Side-by-side specs

Spec Fathom Make
Category Productivity Productivity
Pricing model freemium freemium
Headline pricing Freemium โ€” Free core; Team $19/user/mo Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits
Free tier Unlimited recording, transcription, and AI summaries for individual users Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.
AI Score 8.8/10 8.7/10
Best for Individuals and sales teams who want unlimited free meeting transcription without a bot visibly joining the call. Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
Editor's pick โœ“ Yes โœ“ Yes
Use cases productivity agents productivity agents marketing
Date added 2026-04-30 2026-08-02

Pros and cons

Fathom logo

Fathom

Productivity ยท freemium

Pros

  • โœ“No bot joins the meeting โ€” records natively without awkward participant notifications
  • โœ“Free tier includes unlimited recording and transcription, far more generous than competitors
  • โœ“Clean, fast interface that stays out of your way during calls
  • โœ“One-click highlight clips make sharing key moments easy

Cons

  • ร—English-focused โ€” transcription accuracy drops for other languages and heavy accents
  • ร—Team features locked behind $19/user/mo, which adds up for larger organizations
  • ร—Fewer third-party integrations than Fireflies.ai or Otter.ai at this stage
  • ร—No conversation intelligence analytics on the free plan
๐Ÿ”—

Make

Productivity ยท freemium

Pros

  • โœ“Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
  • โœ“Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
  • โœ“3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
  • โœ“Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
  • โœ“Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

Cons

  • ร—Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
  • ร—The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
  • ร—Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
  • ร—The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
  • ร—Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be
Comparison explorer Add a third tool to this matchup Opens the interactive explorer with Fathom and Make already in place. Slot in up to two more tools from the full index, filter by category or price, and read every plan, feature, pro and con in one table. โ†’

Related comparisons

Updated 2026-08-02. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.