Productivity ยท Head-to-head

Zapier vs Make

Zapier (freemium, AI Score 8.9/10) vs Make (freemium, AI Score 8.7/10). Side-by-side pricing, features, pros and cons, and which to pick.

The verdict

Pick Zapier ifโ€ฆ
  • โ†’your primary use case is teams that need to connect many saas apps and build automations from a plain-english description instead of manual setup.
Try Zapier โ†’
Pick Make ifโ€ฆ
  • โ†’you want our editor's pick for this category
  • โ†’your primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
  • โ†’you need: marketing
Try Make โ†’

Side-by-side specs

Spec Zapier Make
Category Productivity Productivity
Pricing model freemium freemium
Headline pricing Freemium Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits
Free tier 100 tasks per month with single-step Zaps Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.
AI Score 8.9/10 8.7/10
Best for Teams that need to connect many SaaS apps and build automations from a plain-English description instead of manual setup. Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
Editor's pick โ€” โœ“ Yes
Use cases productivity agents productivity agents marketing
Date added 2025-05-15 2026-08-02

Pros and cons

Zapier logo

Zapier

Productivity ยท freemium

Pros

  • โœ“Largest app ecosystem (7,000+ integrations)
  • โœ“AI-powered workflow builder
  • โœ“No coding required for complex automations
  • โœ“Reliable and well-documented

Cons

  • ร—Gets expensive with high task volumes
  • ร—Free tier is very limited
  • ร—Complex workflows can be hard to debug
  • ร—Task-based pricing can be unpredictable
๐Ÿ”—

Make

Productivity ยท freemium

Pros

  • โœ“Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
  • โœ“Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
  • โœ“3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
  • โœ“Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
  • โœ“Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

Cons

  • ร—Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
  • ร—The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
  • ร—Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
  • ร—The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
  • ร—Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be
Comparison explorer Add a third tool to this matchup Opens the interactive explorer with Zapier and Make already in place. Slot in up to two more tools from the full index, filter by category or price, and read every plan, feature, pro and con in one table. โ†’

Related comparisons

Updated 2026-08-02. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.