Fugu-Cyber
Sakana AI's cybersecurity-specialized orchestration model, claiming state-of-the-art scores on real-world security benchmarks like CyberGym and CTI-REALM.
Updated 2026-07-21
No free tier is documented for Fugu-Cyber.
Listed pricing: Token plan only: $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output (application required, no free tier).
Overview
Fugu-Cyber is Sakana AI's orchestration model tuned specifically for cybersecurity work — vulnerability discovery, exploit reasoning, and threat-intelligence analysis — released July 21, 2026 as a new API endpoint. Where general frontier models handle security tasks as one capability among many, Fugu-Cyber is trained and evaluated against domain benchmarks, and Sakana positions its scores on CyberGym (real-world vulnerability tasks) and CTI-REALM (cyber threat intelligence) as state-of-the-art, matching the dedicated cyber variants of GPT-5.5.
It's built for security engineers, red teams, and threat researchers who want a model that behaves like a coordinated agent across security tooling rather than a chat window. As an "orchestration" model, the pitch is that it plans and sequences multi-step security workflows — enumerating a target, reasoning about a vulnerability class, drafting analysis — instead of answering one prompt at a time. This is a raw model accessed through an API, not a packaged app, so you're wiring it into your own pipeline or agent framework.
The honest caveat: nearly everything known about performance comes from Sakana's own release, and access is gated behind an application-and-approval process with no free tier or public playground. That makes independent verification hard right now, and the specialization cuts both ways — this is not a general-purpose model you'd reach for outside security contexts.
Is Fugu-Cyber free?
No free tier is documented for Fugu-Cyber.
Listed pricing: Token plan only: $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output (application required, no free tier).
No figure is estimated here for what is not published. Check Fugu-Cyber's own site for the current terms.
Pricing on this page has not been re-verified. The entry was last edited on , and no separate pricing check has been run since. Treat the figures as a record of what was published then and confirm on the official site.
Fugu-Cyber pricing
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Token Plan | $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output | Pay-per-token API access; rates scale up for large-context requests. Access requires application approval. |
Pay-per-token API access; rates scale up for large-context requests. Access requires application approval.
Pricing on this page has not been re-verified. The entry was last edited on , and no separate pricing check has been run since. Treat the figures as a record of what was published then and confirm on the official site.
Is Fugu-Cyber worth it?
Worth it for Security engineers, red teams, and threat researchers who need an API model specialized for vulnerability discovery and threat-intelligence analysis.
There is no free tier to test it on, so the plans above are the entry cost. The recorded trade-offs are listed below, and any one of them can settle the question on its own.
The 8.2/10 AI Score is an editorial read of published capability, price and shipping pace. Nobody here has hands-on hours with Fugu-Cyber. How we verify.
Worth it if
The strengths recorded against this entry.
- Specialized for cybersecurity rather than a general model used off-label
- Claimed SOTA on real-world benchmarks (CyberGym, CTI-REALM), not just synthetic tests
- Orchestration design targets multi-step agentic security workflows
- Application-gated rollout is a reasonable posture for offensive-security capability
Not worth it if
Any one of these blocks your use case.
- Access is gated behind application approval with no free tier or public playground
- Performance claims come almost entirely from Sakana's own release — little independent verification yet
- Output pricing is steep and scales higher for large-context requests
- Narrow specialization: not useful outside security work
What sets Fugu-Cyber apart
- Trained and evaluated specifically for cybersecurity work, not general-purpose use
- Claimed state-of-the-art scores on real-world benchmarks CyberGym and CTI-REALM
- Orchestration design that plans and sequences multi-step security workflows
- Application-gated rollout with no free tier, reflecting offensive-security capability
Key features
Cyber Orchestration
Positioned as an orchestration model that plans and sequences multi-step security workflows rather than answering isolated prompts, aimed at agentic red-team and analysis pipelines.
Frontier Benchmarks
Sakana reports state-of-the-art results on CyberGym (real-world vulnerability tasks) and CTI-REALM (threat intelligence), claiming parity with GPT-5.5's dedicated cyber variants.
API Endpoint
Delivered as a new API endpoint with token-based pricing, meant to be integrated into existing security tooling and agent frameworks rather than used through a chat UI.
Gated Access
Availability requires an application and approval, signaling a controlled rollout appropriate to a model with offensive-security capabilities.
How it compares
| Tool | Best for | Pricing | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fugu-Cyber | Security engineers, red teams, and threat researchers who need an API model specialized for vulnerability discovery and threat-intelligence analysis. | Token plan only: $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output (application required, no free tier) | 8.2/10 |
| Perplexity AI vs Perplexity AI → | Knowledge workers and researchers who want cited, synthesized answers instead of a list of links to click through. | Freemium | 9.4/10 |
| NotebookLM vs NotebookLM → | people who want cited answers and Studio outputs from a specific set of sources. | Free tier; Google AI Pro $19.99/mo | 9.1/10 |
| Inkling-Small vs Inkling-Small → | — | Free — open weights download; Tinker Playground access | 8.8/10 |
Compare head-to-head
Related reading
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash-1017 Hits Web, App, and API
V4.1-Flash-1017 is live on DeepSeek's site, app, and API, with shorter outputs and a Harness floor of v0.2.1-rc.1.
Anthropic's Public Benefit Fund and the Share Ratchet
Anthropic's fund starts at 5% of shares and can add 2% per 50% value rise. With founder pledges and the employee match, public-bound equity is about 20%.
Run Parallel Agents on GPT-6 Astra Pro
OpenAI's post says multiple agents can split one task in parallel, with progress you follow and finished work you open.
Ready to try Fugu-Cyber?
Head to the official site to start with Fugu-Cyber — pricing and plans are listed above.
Visit Fugu-Cyber
