Research Token plan only: $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output (application required, no free tier)

Fugu-Cyber

Sakana AI's cybersecurity-specialized orchestration model, claiming state-of-the-art scores on real-world security benchmarks like CyberGym and CTI-REALM.

Updated 2026-07-21

8.2
AI Score / 10
Fugu-Cyber Visit
Quick answer

No free tier is documented for Fugu-Cyber.

Listed pricing: Token plan only: $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output (application required, no free tier).

Pricing not re-verified Is it free? Pricing Is it worth it?
Best for
Security engineers, red teams, and threat researchers who need an API model specialized for vulnerability discovery and threat-intelligence analysis.

Overview

Fugu-Cyber is Sakana AI's orchestration model tuned specifically for cybersecurity work — vulnerability discovery, exploit reasoning, and threat-intelligence analysis — released July 21, 2026 as a new API endpoint. Where general frontier models handle security tasks as one capability among many, Fugu-Cyber is trained and evaluated against domain benchmarks, and Sakana positions its scores on CyberGym (real-world vulnerability tasks) and CTI-REALM (cyber threat intelligence) as state-of-the-art, matching the dedicated cyber variants of GPT-5.5.

It's built for security engineers, red teams, and threat researchers who want a model that behaves like a coordinated agent across security tooling rather than a chat window. As an "orchestration" model, the pitch is that it plans and sequences multi-step security workflows — enumerating a target, reasoning about a vulnerability class, drafting analysis — instead of answering one prompt at a time. This is a raw model accessed through an API, not a packaged app, so you're wiring it into your own pipeline or agent framework.

The honest caveat: nearly everything known about performance comes from Sakana's own release, and access is gated behind an application-and-approval process with no free tier or public playground. That makes independent verification hard right now, and the specialization cuts both ways — this is not a general-purpose model you'd reach for outside security contexts.

Is Fugu-Cyber free?

No free tier is documented for Fugu-Cyber.

Listed pricing: Token plan only: $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output (application required, no free tier).

No figure is estimated here for what is not published. Check Fugu-Cyber's own site for the current terms.

Pricing on this page has not been re-verified. The entry was last edited on , and no separate pricing check has been run since. Treat the figures as a record of what was published then and confirm on the official site.

Fugu-Cyber pricing

Token Plan $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output

Pay-per-token API access; rates scale up for large-context requests. Access requires application approval.

Pricing on this page has not been re-verified. The entry was last edited on , and no separate pricing check has been run since. Treat the figures as a record of what was published then and confirm on the official site.

Is Fugu-Cyber worth it?

Worth it for Security engineers, red teams, and threat researchers who need an API model specialized for vulnerability discovery and threat-intelligence analysis.

There is no free tier to test it on, so the plans above are the entry cost. The recorded trade-offs are listed below, and any one of them can settle the question on its own.

The 8.2/10 AI Score is an editorial read of published capability, price and shipping pace. Nobody here has hands-on hours with Fugu-Cyber. How we verify.

Worth it if

The strengths recorded against this entry.

  • Specialized for cybersecurity rather than a general model used off-label
  • Claimed SOTA on real-world benchmarks (CyberGym, CTI-REALM), not just synthetic tests
  • Orchestration design targets multi-step agentic security workflows
  • Application-gated rollout is a reasonable posture for offensive-security capability

Not worth it if

Any one of these blocks your use case.

  • Access is gated behind application approval with no free tier or public playground
  • Performance claims come almost entirely from Sakana's own release — little independent verification yet
  • Output pricing is steep and scales higher for large-context requests
  • Narrow specialization: not useful outside security work

What sets Fugu-Cyber apart

  • Trained and evaluated specifically for cybersecurity work, not general-purpose use
  • Claimed state-of-the-art scores on real-world benchmarks CyberGym and CTI-REALM
  • Orchestration design that plans and sequences multi-step security workflows
  • Application-gated rollout with no free tier, reflecting offensive-security capability

Key features

Cyber Orchestration

Positioned as an orchestration model that plans and sequences multi-step security workflows rather than answering isolated prompts, aimed at agentic red-team and analysis pipelines.

Frontier Benchmarks

Sakana reports state-of-the-art results on CyberGym (real-world vulnerability tasks) and CTI-REALM (threat intelligence), claiming parity with GPT-5.5's dedicated cyber variants.

API Endpoint

Delivered as a new API endpoint with token-based pricing, meant to be integrated into existing security tooling and agent frameworks rather than used through a chat UI.

Gated Access

Availability requires an application and approval, signaling a controlled rollout appropriate to a model with offensive-security capabilities.

How it compares

Compare head-to-head

Comparison explorer Put Fugu-Cyber up against any three tools Opens with Fugu-Cyber already loaded. Add up to three more from the full index and read pricing, features, pros and cons in one table.

Related reading

Ready to try Fugu-Cyber?

Head to the official site to start with Fugu-Cyber — pricing and plans are listed above.

Visit Fugu-Cyber
Weekly issue

The 5 AI tools that mattered this week.

One email, Fridays. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.