Research · Head-to-head
Consensus vs Fugu-Cyber
Consensus vs Fugu-Cyber: pricing, features, and which to pick in 2026.
The verdict
Pick Consensus if…
- →you need a genuinely free option
- →budget is the constraint
- →overall capability matters more than price (AI Score 8.7 vs 8.2)
- →you want our editor's pick for this category
Pick Fugu-Cyber if…
- →your primary use case is security engineers, red teams, and threat researchers who need an api model specialized for vulnerability discovery and threat-intelligence analysis.
- →you need: agents
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Consensus | Fugu-Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Research | Research |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Headline pricing | Free tier + Premium from $8.99/mo | Token plan only: $6–$12/M input, $36–$54/M output (application required, no free tier) |
| Free tier | 20 AI-powered searches per month with basic features | — |
| AI Score | 8.7/10 | 8.2/10 |
| Best for | Researchers, students, and healthcare professionals who need a fast, citation-backed answer on what the evidence says. | Security engineers, red teams, and threat researchers who need an API model specialized for vulnerability discovery and threat-intelligence analysis. |
| Editor's pick | ✓ Yes | — |
| Use cases | research education | research agents |
| Date added | 2026-05-01 | 2026-07-21 |
Pros and cons
Consensus
Research · freemium
Pros
- ✓Consensus Meter gives instant visual evidence breakdown — unique among academic search tools
- ✓250M+ paper database with strong coverage across sciences and social sciences
- ✓Answers are always grounded in peer-reviewed literature with full citations
- ✓Study snapshots extract methodology and sample size so you can assess quality fast
Cons
- ×Free tier is restrictive at 20 AI searches — you'll hit the limit quickly during a literature review
- ×Coverage is weaker outside STEM and social sciences — humanities and legal research fall short
- ×Cannot upload or analyze your own documents like NotebookLM or Elicit
- ×Consensus Meter can oversimplify nuanced topics where study quality varies widely
Fugu-Cyber
Research · paid
Pros
- ✓Specialized for cybersecurity rather than a general model used off-label
- ✓Claimed SOTA on real-world benchmarks (CyberGym, CTI-REALM), not just synthetic tests
- ✓Orchestration design targets multi-step agentic security workflows
- ✓Application-gated rollout is a reasonable posture for offensive-security capability
Cons
- ×Access is gated behind application approval with no free tier or public playground
- ×Performance claims come almost entirely from Sakana's own release — little independent verification yet
- ×Output pricing is steep and scales higher for large-context requests
- ×Narrow specialization: not useful outside security work
Related comparisons
Updated 2026-07-21. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.