Productivity ยท Head-to-head
Make vs Zoom AI Companion
Make vs Zoom AI Companion: pricing, features, and which to pick in 2026.
The verdict
Pick Make ifโฆ
- โoverall capability matters more than price (AI Score 8.7 vs 8.1)
- โyou want our editor's pick for this category
- โyour primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
- โyou need: agents, marketing
Pick Zoom AI Companion ifโฆ
- โyour primary use case is teams already on paid zoom workplace plans who want meeting summaries, smart recordings, and drafted messages without buying a separate meeting-assistant subscription.
- โyou need: content-creation
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Make | Zoom AI Companion |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Headline pricing | Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits | Included with paid Zoom Workplace plans; AI Companion 2.0 add-on from $13/user/mo |
| Free tier | Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers. | Base AI Companion included at no extra cost with Zoom Workplace Pro, Business, and Enterprise plans |
| AI Score | 8.7/10 | 8.1/10 |
| Best for | Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps. | Teams already on paid Zoom Workplace plans who want meeting summaries, smart recordings, and drafted messages without buying a separate meeting-assistant subscription. |
| Editor's pick | โ Yes | โ |
| Use cases | productivity agents marketing | productivity content-creation |
| Date added | 2026-08-02 | 2026-05-01 |
Pros and cons
๐
Make
Productivity ยท freemium
Pros
- โVisual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
- โRouters and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
- โ3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
- โFree tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
- โEntry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier
Cons
- รCredits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
- รThe advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
- รFree tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
- รThe canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
- รFull-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be
๐ฅ
Zoom AI Companion
Productivity ยท freemium
Pros
- โIncluded free with paid Zoom plans โ no additional per-seat cost for base features
- โZero onboarding since it's built into the app your team already uses
- โSmart recording chapters make long meetings actually reviewable
- โReal-time mid-meeting queries let latecomers catch up without asking others to repeat
Cons
- รOnly works within the Zoom ecosystem โ no help if you also use Meet or Teams
- รSummary quality drops in unstructured brainstorms or heavily cross-talk conversations
- รAdvanced AI Companion 2.0 features require a paid add-on starting at $13/user/month
- รFree Zoom users get no AI Companion features at all โ requires a paid Workplace plan
Related comparisons
Updated 2026-08-02. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.