Productivity · Head-to-head

Make vs Mistral OCR 4

Make (freemium, AI Score 8.7/10) vs Mistral OCR 4 (paid, AI Score 8/10). Side-by-side pricing, features, pros and cons, and which to pick.

The verdict

Pick Make if…

Try Make →

Pick Mistral OCR 4 if…

→your primary use case is engineering teams building high-volume document pipelines — invoice, contract or claims extraction — who need positioned text and a confidence threshold they can audit, not just a transcript of the page.
→you need: development

Try Mistral OCR 4 →

Spec	Make	Mistral OCR 4
Category	Productivity	Productivity
Pricing model	freemium	paid
Headline pricing	Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits	API $4 / 1,000 pages ($2 batch); Document AI $5 / 1,000 pages — check site for current rates
Free tier	Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.	—
AI Score	8.7/10	8/10
Best for	Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.	Engineering teams building high-volume document pipelines — invoice, contract or claims extraction — who need positioned text and a confidence threshold they can audit, not just a transcript of the page.
Editor's pick	✓ Yes	—
Use cases	productivity agents marketing	productivity development
Date added	2026-08-02	2026-07-01

🔗

Productivity · freemium

✓Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
✓Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
✓3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
✓Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
✓Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

×Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
×The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
×Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
×The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
×Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be

Productivity · paid

✓Structured output — bounding boxes, block types and per-element confidence, not just extracted text
✓Batch tier roughly halves the per-page rate, which is what makes bulk digitization budgetable
✓170-language coverage including non-Latin scripts
✓Confidence scores support a real auto-accept vs. human-review threshold, useful for audited workflows
✓Per-page pricing is transparent and undercuts much of the entrenched enterprise document stack

×No free tier — you pay from the first page, where several rivals offer a monthly free page quota
×General-purpose multimodal models increasingly read documents and answer questions in one call, making a separate OCR hop harder to justify for simple extraction
×API-only: no consumer or business-user front end, so someone has to build the pipeline around it
×Accuracy on messy handwriting and poor-quality scans is not covered by independent third-party benchmarking that we can point to

Updated 2026-08-10. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.