Productivity · Head-to-head

Make vs Microsoft Scout

Make vs Microsoft Scout: pricing, features, and which to pick in 2026.

The verdict

Pick Make if…

Try Make →

Pick Microsoft Scout if…

→your primary use case is enterprise microsoft 365 users in the frontier preview who want an always-on agent to execute multi-step work across office apps in the background.

Try Microsoft Scout →

Spec	Make	Microsoft Scout
Category	Productivity	Productivity
Pricing model	freemium	paid
Headline pricing	Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits	Private preview (Frontier program + GitHub Copilot license required)
Free tier	Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.	—
AI Score	8.7/10	7.5/10
Best for	Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.	Enterprise Microsoft 365 users in the Frontier preview who want an always-on agent to execute multi-step work across Office apps in the background.
Editor's pick	✓ Yes	—
Use cases	productivity agents marketing	productivity agents
Date added	2026-08-02	2026-06-12

🔗

Productivity · freemium

✓Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
✓Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
✓3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
✓Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
✓Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

×Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
×The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
×Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
×The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
×Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be

Productivity · paid

✓Autonomous multi-step task execution across the entire Microsoft 365 suite — a genuine step beyond copilot-style prompt-and-response
✓Deep Microsoft Graph integration provides rich organizational context about your files, emails, chats, and calendar for smarter task planning
✓Background execution lets you delegate work and move on instead of babysitting a chat interface through each step
✓Enterprise-grade security and compliance inherited from the Microsoft 365 platform

×Private preview only — no general availability date announced, limited to Frontier program enrollees
×No public pricing yet — likely to carry a significant per-user premium on top of existing Microsoft 365 and Copilot costs
×Autonomous agent reliability is unproven at scale — multi-step task chains can fail silently or produce unexpected results
×Locked to the Microsoft ecosystem — zero utility if your organization runs on Google Workspace or other platforms