Productivity · Head-to-head

Make vs Mem.ai

Make vs Mem.ai: pricing, features, and which to pick in 2026.

The verdict

Pick Make if…

→overall capability matters more than price (AI Score 8.7 vs 8.2)
→you want our editor's pick for this category
→your primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
→you need: agents, marketing

Try Make →

Pick Mem.ai if…

→your primary use case is knowledge workers, founders, and researchers who pile up unstructured notes and want them organized and findable without manual filing.
→you need: research, content-creation

Try Mem.ai →

Spec	Make	Mem.ai
Category	Productivity	Productivity
Pricing model	freemium	freemium
Headline pricing	Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits	Free tier + Pro $14.99/mo
Free tier	Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.	Basic note-taking with limited AI features
AI Score	8.7/10	8.2/10
Best for	Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.	Knowledge workers, founders, and researchers who pile up unstructured notes and want them organized and findable without manual filing.
Editor's pick	✓ Yes	—
Use cases	productivity agents marketing	productivity research content-creation
Date added	2026-08-02	2026-04-30

🔗

Productivity · freemium

✓Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
✓Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
✓3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
✓Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
✓Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

×Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
×The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
×Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
×The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
×Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be

Productivity · freemium

✓Genuinely useful auto-organization removes the burden of manual filing and tagging
✓Semantic search finds relevant notes even when you can't remember exact keywords
✓Frictionless capture — just write, and the AI handles the rest
✓Gets smarter and more useful as your note volume grows

×Less structured than Notion — power users who want databases and views may feel limited
×Free tier AI usage is quite restricted, pushing you toward Pro quickly
×No offline mode — requires internet connection for core AI features
×Smaller ecosystem and fewer integrations compared to established note apps