Productivity · Head-to-head

Make vs Jobbie

Make vs Jobbie: pricing, features, and which to pick in 2026.

The verdict

Pick Make if…

→overall capability matters more than price (AI Score 8.7 vs 7.8)
→you want our editor's pick for this category
→your primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
→you need: marketing

Try Make →

Pick Jobbie if…

→your primary use case is active job seekers applying to dozens of roles a week who want tailored applications submitted automatically instead of filling out each form by hand.

Try Jobbie →

Spec	Make	Jobbie
Category	Productivity	Productivity
Pricing model	freemium	freemium
Headline pricing	Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits	Free to start (no credit card) + paid plans for higher volume
Free tier	Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.	Free to start with no credit card required, aimed at letting you test the auto-apply flow before paying for higher volume
AI Score	8.7/10	7.8/10
Best for	Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.	Active job seekers applying to dozens of roles a week who want tailored applications submitted automatically instead of filling out each form by hand.
Editor's pick	✓ Yes	—
Use cases	productivity agents marketing	productivity agents
Date added	2026-08-02	2026-07-03

🔗

Productivity · freemium

✓Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
✓Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
✓3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
✓Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
✓Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

×Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
×The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
×Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
×The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
×Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be

Productivity · freemium

✓Automates the most repetitive part of job hunting — filling out and submitting applications
✓Tailors each application to the specific role instead of sending one generic resume
✓Free to start with no credit card, so there's no barrier to testing it
✓Can reach 100+ matching roles far faster than applying manually

×High-volume auto-applying risks low-fit, spray-and-pray applications that recruiters and ATS filters screen out
×New tool (launched mid-2026) with a limited track record and few independent reviews
×Automated submission can conflict with some job boards' terms of service
×Exact paid pricing and per-plan application limits aren't clearly published — check the site before committing