Productivity · Head-to-head

Make vs Jobbie

Make (freemium, AI Score 8.7/10) vs Jobbie (freemium, AI Score 7/10). Side-by-side pricing, features, pros and cons, and which to pick.

The verdict

Pick Make if…

→overall capability matters more than price (AI Score 8.7 vs 7)
→you want our editor's pick for this category
→your primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
→you need: marketing

Try Make →

Pick Jobbie if…

→your primary use case is job seekers running a high-volume search — recent grads or laid-off workers on a deadline — who are sending dozens of applications a week and want the form-filling handled so their time goes to networking and interview prep.

Try Jobbie →

Spec	Make	Jobbie
Category	Productivity	Productivity
Pricing model	freemium	freemium
Headline pricing	Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits	Free to start (no credit card) + paid plans — check website for current pricing
Free tier	Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.	Free to start with no credit card, with a capped number of applications so you can see how the tailoring and submission flow behaves before paying
AI Score	8.7/10	7/10
Best for	Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.	Job seekers running a high-volume search — recent grads or laid-off workers on a deadline — who are sending dozens of applications a week and want the form-filling handled so their time goes to networking and interview prep.
Editor's pick	✓ Yes	—
Use cases	productivity agents marketing	productivity agents
Date added	2026-08-02	2026-07-03

🔗

Productivity · freemium

✓Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
✓Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
✓3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
✓Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
✓Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

×Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
×The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
×Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
×The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
×Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be

Productivity · freemium

✓Removes the single most repetitive part of job hunting — reading a posting, re-editing a resume, and retyping the same details into another form
✓Tailors each submission to the specific job description rather than sending one generic resume everywhere
✓Free tier requires no credit card, so the real cost of evaluating it is time, not money
✓Continuous board scanning gets applications out early, which measurably matters on high-volume postings

×Paid pricing and per-plan application caps still are not clearly published, so you cannot compare cost per application against rivals before signing up
×General agentic browser assistants now fill out arbitrary web forms, which weakens the case for a single-purpose auto-apply subscription
×Automated submission conflicts with the terms of service on several major job boards, and enforcement has tightened
×Volume cuts both ways — recruiters and ATS filters actively screen for low-fit bulk applications, and a misconfigured filter set produces exactly that

Updated 2026-08-10. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.