Productivity ยท Head-to-head
Make vs Dia
Make vs Dia: pricing, features, and which to pick in 2026.
The verdict
Pick Make ifโฆ
- โoverall capability matters more than price (AI Score 8.7 vs 7.9)
- โyou want our editor's pick for this category
- โyour primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
- โyou need: agents, marketing
Pick Dia ifโฆ
- โyour primary use case is mac users who want the browser to double as a work dashboard, pulling calendar, inbox and workspace tools into one place instead of another set of tabs.
- โyou need: research
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Make | Dia |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Headline pricing | Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits | Free to download; a Dia Pro tier lifts chat limits |
| Free tier | Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers. | Yes. Dia is free to download and the free tier includes AI chat, with a cap on chat usage that the Pro tier removes. |
| AI Score | 8.7/10 | 7.9/10 |
| Best for | Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps. | Mac users who want the browser to double as a work dashboard, pulling calendar, inbox and workspace tools into one place instead of another set of tabs. |
| Editor's pick | โ Yes | โ |
| Use cases | productivity agents marketing | productivity research |
| Date added | 2026-08-02 | 2026-08-02 |
Pros and cons
๐
Make
Productivity ยท freemium
Pros
- โVisual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
- โRouters and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
- โ3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
- โFree tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
- โEntry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier
Cons
- รCredits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
- รThe advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
- รFree tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
- รThe canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
- รFull-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be
๐
Dia
Productivity ยท freemium
Pros
- โPulls calendar, inbox, Slack and Notion context together instead of reasoning only about the tab in front of it
- โDecks and Reports produce something usable rather than stopping at a summary
- โTab organisation, Profiles and Splits are genuinely good browser ergonomics, independent of the AI
- โTrackers and ads blocked by default, with SOC 2 coverage stated on the site
- โFree to download with AI chat included on the free tier
Cons
- รmacOS 14 or later on M1 or newer only, which excludes Intel Macs and every Windows machine
- รWindows support is stated only as "coming this fall" with a beta waitlist and no firm date
- รThe site publishes no server-rendered pricing table, so the Dia Pro price cannot be checked without installing the browser
- รFree-tier chat is capped, and the site does not state where the cap sits
- รDeep workspace integration means granting a browser access to Slack, Notion, calendar and mail, which is a broad permission surface
Related comparisons
Updated 2026-08-02. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.