Productivity · Head-to-head

Make vs Comet

Make vs Comet: pricing, features, and which to pick in 2026.

The verdict

Pick Make if…

→you want our editor's pick for this category
→your primary use case is teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.
→you need: marketing

Try Make →

Pick Comet if…

→your primary use case is people who want an assistant that acts on the page in front of them, and who would rather switch browsers than add another tab to their workflow.
→you need: research

Try Comet →

Spec	Make	Comet
Category	Productivity	Productivity
Pricing model	freemium	freemium
Headline pricing	Free tier with 1,000 credits/mo; paid from $9/mo for 10,000 credits	Free to download; Perplexity Max at $200/mo unlocks the highest limits
Free tier	Yes, and it runs real scenarios: 1,000 credits a month across 2 active scenarios, with a 15-minute minimum run interval. Annual billing is advertised at 15%+ savings on the paid tiers.	Yes. The browser is a free download and works without a paid Perplexity plan. The agentic features and the higher query limits are what a subscription buys.
AI Score	8.7/10	8.4/10
Best for	Teams building multi-step, branching automations who want to see the whole flow on a canvas rather than describe it as a list of steps.	People who want an assistant that acts on the page in front of them, and who would rather switch browsers than add another tab to their workflow.
Editor's pick	✓ Yes	—
Use cases	productivity agents marketing	productivity research agents
Date added	2026-08-02	2026-08-02

🔗

Productivity · freemium

✓Visual canvas makes branching and conditional automations readable in a way a linear step list does not
✓Routers and error handler modules cost zero credits, so defensive structure does not inflate the bill
✓3,000+ connectors including 400+ AI integrations, which covers most of what a small team needs to wire together
✓Free tier runs genuine scenarios on a schedule rather than expiring like a trial
✓Entry pricing starts at $9/mo, well below what comparable platforms charge for a first paid tier

×Credits are consumed per module action, so a multi-step scenario burns the allowance far faster than the plan names suggest
×The advertised $9, $16 and $29 prices are only the 10,000-credit rung of a slider, and real costs climb from there
×Free tier caps scheduling at a 15-minute minimum interval and execution at 5 minutes, which rules out anything time-sensitive
×The canvas is harder to learn than a form-based builder, which is a real cost for occasional users
×Full-text log search sits on Pro, so debugging on the cheaper tiers is more painful than it should be

☄️

Productivity · freemium

✓Assistant operates on the page you are already viewing instead of in a separate window with no context
✓Chromium base keeps most Chrome extensions working, which removes the usual dealbreaker when switching browsers
✓Import carries bookmarks, passwords, cookies, history and extensions across in one step
✓Free to download with no subscription required to start using it
✓Background Assistants give paying users parallel agentic tasks with confirmations gathered in one place

×Browser-agent limits are published only as relative claims, so no tier states how many agent queries you actually get
×The features most people want the browser for, Background Assistants and Email Assistant, sit behind the $200/mo Max tier
×Switching browsers is a bigger commitment than installing an extension, and profile migration is never fully clean
×An assistant with access to your logged-in sessions is a meaningful trust decision that a chat window in another tab does not require