Consensus
AI search engine that synthesizes answers from 250M+ peer-reviewed papers with evidence-based consensus meters.
Updated 2026-05-01
Overview
Consensus is an AI-powered academic search engine that answers research questions by synthesizing findings from over 250 million peer-reviewed scientific papers. Instead of returning a list of links, it reads papers, extracts relevant findings, and presents a direct answer backed by citations — think Perplexity, but exclusively for scientific literature.
The standout feature is the Consensus Meter, which shows at a glance how strongly the body of research supports or contradicts a given claim. Ask "Does creatine improve cognitive performance?" and you'll see a percentage breakdown of studies that say yes, no, or are mixed — something no other tool does this cleanly. It also generates structured study snapshots showing methodology, sample size, and key outcomes for each cited paper.
Consensus is built for researchers, students, healthcare professionals, and evidence-based practitioners who need fast, reliable literature review without wading through hundreds of abstracts. It's not trying to replace deep systematic reviews, but for quickly establishing what the evidence says on a topic, it's the fastest path from question to answer in academic AI.
What sets Consensus apart
- Consensus Meter shows a visual percentage breakdown of supporting studies
- Synthesizes answers from 250M+ peer-reviewed papers
- Study snapshots surface methodology and sample size per citation
Key features
250M+ Papers
Searches across more than 250 million peer-reviewed academic papers sourced from Semantic Scholar's corpus, covering medicine, biology, social sciences, computer science, and more.
Consensus Meter
Visual indicator showing the percentage of studies that support, oppose, or are mixed on a given claim. Gives you an instant evidence snapshot without reading every abstract.
Evidence Synthesis
AI reads and synthesizes findings from multiple relevant papers into a direct, cited answer. Includes study snapshots with methodology, sample sizes, and key outcomes.
Pricing
Free tier: 20 AI-powered searches per month with basic features
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | 20 AI credits/mo, basic search, limited Consensus Meters |
| Premium | $8.99/mo | Unlimited AI credits, unlimited Consensus Meters, GPT-4 summaries, study snapshots, bookmarks |
| Team | $12.99/mo | Everything in Premium plus shared workspace, team analytics, priority support |
20 AI credits/mo, basic search, limited Consensus Meters
Unlimited AI credits, unlimited Consensus Meters, GPT-4 summaries, study snapshots, bookmarks
Everything in Premium plus shared workspace, team analytics, priority support
Pros & cons
Pros
- ✓Consensus Meter gives instant visual evidence breakdown — unique among academic search tools
- ✓250M+ paper database with strong coverage across sciences and social sciences
- ✓Answers are always grounded in peer-reviewed literature with full citations
- ✓Study snapshots extract methodology and sample size so you can assess quality fast
Cons
- ×Free tier is restrictive at 20 AI searches — you'll hit the limit quickly during a literature review
- ×Coverage is weaker outside STEM and social sciences — humanities and legal research fall short
- ×Cannot upload or analyze your own documents like NotebookLM or Elicit
- ×Consensus Meter can oversimplify nuanced topics where study quality varies widely
How it compares
| Tool | Best for | Pricing | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Researchers, students, and healthcare professionals who need a fast, citation-backed answer on what the evidence says. | Free tier + Premium from $8.99/mo | 8.7/10 |
| Perplexity AI vs Perplexity AI → | Knowledge workers and researchers who want cited, synthesized answers instead of a list of links to click through. | Freemium | 9.4/10 |
| NotebookLM vs NotebookLM → | Students, researchers, and professionals who need answers grounded strictly in the specific documents they upload. | Free | 9.1/10 |
| Phind vs Phind → | Developers who want technical questions answered with working code examples and cited sources instead of manual doc searches. | Free tier + Pro subscription for advanced models | 8.7/10 |
Compare head-to-head
Related reading
Glasswing's Real Crisis: Vulns Faster Than Patches
Anthropic's Glasswing found 10,000 vulnerabilities in a month. The real story isn't discovery — it's the patching bottleneck that follows.
Grok Build CLI: xAI's Agentic Terminal Coding Tool
xAI launched Grok Build CLI in early beta on May 14 — an agentic terminal coding tool with subagents and plan review, exclusive to SuperGrok Heavy.
Grok 4.6 Release Date: Two Weeks Out, Per Musk
Elon Musk put Grok 4.6 about two weeks out on July 28, with 4.7 close behind. What that timeline changes for anyone already building on Grok 4.5.
Ready to try Consensus?
Head to the official site to start with Consensus — pricing and plans are listed above.
Visit Consensus