Productivity · Head-to-head
Comet vs Gamma
Comet (freemium, AI Score 8.4/10) vs Gamma (freemium, AI Score 8.3/10). Side-by-side pricing, features, pros and cons, and which to pick.
The verdict
Pick Comet if…
- →your primary use case is people who want an assistant that acts on the page in front of them, and who would rather switch browsers than add another tab to their workflow.
- →you need: research, agents
Pick Gamma if…
- →your primary use case is founders, sales teams, and educators who need a client-ready deck, one-pager, or landing page out of an outline today and care more about speed-to-polished than pixel-level layout control.
- →you need: content-creation, design, marketing
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Comet | Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Headline pricing | Free to download; Perplexity Max at $200/mo unlocks the highest limits | Free (400 credits) + Plus $10/mo, Pro $20/mo, Ultra $60/mo (annual billing) — confirm current rates on site |
| Free tier | Yes. The browser is a free download and works without a paid Perplexity plan. The agentic features and the higher query limits are what a subscription buys. | 400 AI credits at signup — enough to build and iterate on a few full decks before deciding. Note: month-to-month billing costs more than the annual rates shown, and Gamma adjusts tiers fairly often, so confirm current numbers at gamma.app/pricing before quoting them. |
| AI Score | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Best for | People who want an assistant that acts on the page in front of them, and who would rather switch browsers than add another tab to their workflow. | Founders, sales teams, and educators who need a client-ready deck, one-pager, or landing page out of an outline today and care more about speed-to-polished than pixel-level layout control. |
| Editor's pick | — | — |
| Use cases | productivity research agents | content-creation design productivity marketing |
| Date added | 2026-08-02 | 2026-04-30 |
Pros and cons
☄️
Comet
Productivity · freemium
Pros
- ✓Assistant operates on the page you are already viewing instead of in a separate window with no context
- ✓Chromium base keeps most Chrome extensions working, which removes the usual dealbreaker when switching browsers
- ✓Import carries bookmarks, passwords, cookies, history and extensions across in one step
- ✓Free to download with no subscription required to start using it
- ✓Background Assistants give paying users parallel agentic tasks with confirmations gathered in one place
Cons
- ×Browser-agent limits are published only as relative claims, so no tier states how many agent queries you actually get
- ×The features most people want the browser for, Background Assistants and Email Assistant, sit behind the $200/mo Max tier
- ×Switching browsers is a bigger commitment than installing an extension, and profile migration is never fully clean
- ×An assistant with access to your logged-in sessions is a meaningful trust decision that a chat window in another tab does not require
Gamma
Productivity · freemium
Pros
- ✓Prompt or uploaded file to a presentable, on-brand artifact in roughly a minute
- ✓Four output formats — deck, document, hosted webpage, social graphic — from one set of cards
- ✓Import-and-redesign handles existing PowerPoint, PDF, and Slides files, which is how most teams actually get value from it
- ✓Per-card view analytics on shared links, uncommon outside dedicated sales-enablement tools
- ✓Free tier is large enough to evaluate on a real project rather than a toy one
Cons
- ×PowerPoint export flattens nested cards and interactive embeds — the exported file is noticeably worse than the hosted version
- ×Little pixel-level layout control; the guardrails that make it fast are the same ones that frustrate designers
- ×Copilot in PowerPoint and Gemini in Google Slides are bundled into subscriptions many buyers already hold, making Gamma a second line item for deck generation
- ×Credit-metered generation and the premium image/video models sit behind the top tier, so heavy or media-rich use gets expensive fast
Related comparisons
Updated 2026-08-10. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.