LFM2.5-2.6B
Liquid AI's 2.6B open-weight model tuned for on-device agents — tool calling and multi-step planning that runs locally on phones and laptops.
Updated 2026-08-06
Yes. LFM2.5-2.6B is free to use.
Listed pricing: Free open weights — self-host only, no hosted API.
Overview
LFM2.5-2.6B is Liquid AI's August 4, 2026 open-weight release: a 2.6-billion-parameter model trained for agentic work — planning a task, calling tools, reading the results, and taking the next step — at a size that fits on a phone, a laptop, or an edge box rather than a GPU server. It sits at the top of the LFM2 family, which spans sub-billion checkpoints up through this one, and it is distributed as weights you download and run yourself. There is no hosted endpoint and no per-token bill.
The audience is developers building local agents: offline assistants, on-device automation, privacy-constrained pipelines in health or finance where shipping user data to a hosted API is the thing that kills the project, and anyone who wants an agent loop that keeps working in airplane mode. What separates it from the usual open small model is what it was tuned for. Most 2–3B open checkpoints are optimised for chat and completion, and function calling is bolted on afterwards with mixed reliability; Liquid is positioning tool calling and multi-step execution as the primary job. The LFM2 line also uses a hybrid backbone — short convolution blocks interleaved with grouped-query attention rather than a uniform transformer stack — chosen for throughput on CPUs and mobile NPUs, not for leaderboard scores on a datacentre GPU. Liquid pairs the weights with its own edge stack (the LEAP SDK for iOS and Android, plus the Apollo app for trying models locally), which is more deployment scaffolding than most labs ship with a Hugging Face repo.
The honest caveats: 2.6B is 2.6B. This will not hold a long-horizon coding session the way a frontier hosted model does, and if your agent needs deep multi-file reasoning you are picking the wrong weight class. The performance claims are vendor-published and, this soon after release, largely un-replicated by third parties — benchmark it against your own task before committing. And check the licence text yourself: Liquid has historically released LFM weights under its own LFM Open License rather than plain Apache 2.0, with terms that turn on company revenue. That distinction matters a lot if you plan to embed this in something you sell.
Is LFM2.5-2.6B free?
Yes. LFM2.5-2.6B is free to use.
What the free tier covers: The entire model is free to download and run — the only cost is the hardware you run it on.
Listed pricing: Free open weights — self-host only, no hosted API.
Pricing on this page has not been re-verified. The entry was last edited on , and no separate pricing check has been run since. Treat the figures as a record of what was published then and confirm on the official site.
LFM2.5-2.6B pricing
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights | Free | Full model weights for self-hosting on your own hardware. No hosted API, no usage metering. Commercial use is governed by Liquid's model licence — read the terms on the model card, as Liquid's open licence has historically carried a company-revenue threshold rather than being plain Apache 2.0. |
Full model weights for self-hosting on your own hardware. No hosted API, no usage metering. Commercial use is governed by Liquid's model licence — read the terms on the model card, as Liquid's open licence has historically carried a company-revenue threshold rather than being plain Apache 2.0.
Pricing on this page has not been re-verified. The entry was last edited on , and no separate pricing check has been run since. Treat the figures as a record of what was published then and confirm on the official site.
Is LFM2.5-2.6B worth it?
You can test that on the free tier before paying anything. The recorded trade-offs are listed below, and any one of them can settle the question on its own.
The 8.2/10 AI Score is an editorial read of published capability, price and shipping pace. Nobody here has hands-on hours with LFM2.5-2.6B. How we verify.
Worth it if
The strengths recorded against this entry.
- Runs entirely offline on phone- and laptop-class hardware, so there is no per-token cost and no user data leaving the device
- Tuned specifically for tool calling and multi-step execution, not just conversation — the weak spot for most models this size
- Open weights you can fine-tune, quantize, and ship inside your own application
- First-party edge deployment path (LEAP SDK for iOS/Android, Apollo app) instead of leaving you to port it yourself
- Architecture chosen for CPU and NPU throughput rather than GPU benchmark scores
Not worth it if
Any one of these blocks your use case.
- No hosted API — you own inference, quantization, updates, and the ops burden that comes with them
- At 2.6B parameters it will not match frontier hosted models on long-horizon reasoning or substantial code generation
- Performance claims are vendor-published and largely un-replicated by independent evaluators this soon after the August 2026 release
- Licence terms need checking before commercial use — Liquid's open licence has historically included a revenue threshold rather than being unrestricted Apache 2.0
Key features
Agentic tool use
Trained for function calling and multi-step task execution rather than chat alone, so the model can plan a sequence, invoke a tool, read the output, and continue — the loop that most sub-3B open models handle unreliably.
Runs fully on-device
Sized for phones, laptops, and edge hardware, which means no inference bill, no network round-trip latency, and no user data leaving the device. Offline agents keep working with no connection at all.
Open weights, self-hosted
Download, fine-tune, quantize, and embed it in your own product. There is no hosted API to depend on, no rate limits, and no vendor deprecating the endpoint out from under you.
Hybrid conv-attention backbone
The LFM2 architecture interleaves short convolution blocks with grouped-query attention instead of using a uniform transformer stack, a design aimed at throughput on CPUs and mobile NPUs rather than datacentre GPUs.
How it compares
| Tool | Best for | Pricing | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| LFM2.5-2.6B | — | Free open weights — self-host only, no hosted API | 8.2/10 |
| Cursor vs Cursor → | Professional developers handling complex, multi-file refactors who want AI built into a familiar VS Code-based editor. | Freemium | 9.5/10 |
| GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.5 → | Developers and teams needing a frontier reasoning model for agentic coding workflows and large-codebase context handling. | API: $5/$30 per 1M tokens (in/out). ChatGPT Plus $20/mo, Pro $200/mo | 9.4/10 |
| Claude Code vs Claude Code → | Developers who want an agent that works inside an existing repo and toolchain rather than in a hosted editor, and who already pay for a Claude plan. | Included with Claude Free, Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise plans | 9.3/10 |
Compare head-to-head
Related reading
Muse Code Ships With Spark 1.2 and a $0.10 Tier
Meta's Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2 landed August 5 at $1.25/$4.25 per million tokens, or $0.10/$0.20 if Meta can train on your code.
Mistral's Shieldstral Runs Moderation on 16GB
Mistral's Shieldstral is a 3B Apache 2.0 multimodal safety classifier that takes moderation policies as plain-English text and self-hosts on one 16GB GPU.
DeepSeek V4-Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.14 Against $5
DeepSeek's V4-Flash beta lists $0.14 and $0.28 per million tokens against GPT-5.6 Sol's $5 and $30. The cache line and the agent wire format decide the bill.
Ready to try LFM2.5-2.6B?
Head to the official site to start with LFM2.5-2.6B — pricing and plans are listed above.
Visit LFM2.5-2.6B
