Bohrium
AI-for-science research hub with citation-traceable search across 170M+ papers, a Deep Research literature writer, knowledge bases, and scientific computing tools.
Updated 2026-06-27
Yes, within limits. Bohrium runs a free tier with paid plans above it.
Listed pricing: Free tier (daily credits) + Pro from ~$15/mo.
Overview
Bohrium is an AI-for-science research platform from DP Technology that combines semantic academic search across a corpus of 170M+ papers with an AI literature-review writer, personal knowledge bases, scholar profiles, and a set of scientific computing tools. It's built for working researchers — grad students, postdocs, and faculty — who need to move from a question to a sourced synthesis without losing the thread back to the underlying papers.
The differentiator Bohrium leans on hardest is citation traceability. Where general-purpose chatbots and many "research assistants" paraphrase or hallucinate references, Bohrium ties its Deep Research output back to real, locatable papers, which is the difference between a draft you can cite and one you have to re-verify line by line. It sits in the same lane as Elicit, Consensus, SciSpace, and NotebookLM, but adds a scientific-computing angle that reflects its roots — DP Technology is an established player in the DeepModeling open-source ecosystem and collaborates with the Beijing Institute for AI for Science.
The company reports 300,000+ researchers across 100+ universities using the platform. That traction, plus a live, fully operational app (chat, knowledge bases, agents, and tools, also mirrored at bohrium.dp.tech), puts it well past the vaporware stage. The main caveats are typical for this category: domain coverage skews toward the physical and life sciences where DP Technology is strongest, and the AI-written reviews still need expert review before they go anywhere near a submission.
Is Bohrium free?
Yes, within limits. Bohrium runs a free tier with paid plans above it.
What the free tier covers: Yes — a free tier with daily credits (~1,500 reported) covers core search and basic literature review.
Listed pricing: Free tier (daily credits) + Pro from ~$15/mo.
Pricing on this page has not been re-verified. The entry was last edited on , and no separate pricing check has been run since. Treat the figures as a record of what was published then and confirm on the official site.
What the free tier leaves out
Read straight off the plan list below. Vendors move features between tiers, so check the current split before you pay.
- Pro From ~$15/mo Heavier Deep Research and AI Mentor usage; check website for current tiers and limits
- Student / Institutional Custom Discounted student and institutional access — contact for details
Bohrium pricing
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Daily credits (~1,500 reported) covering core academic search and basic literature review |
| Pro | From ~$15/mo | Heavier Deep Research and AI Mentor usage; check website for current tiers and limits |
| Student / Institutional | Custom | Discounted student and institutional access — contact for details |
Daily credits (~1,500 reported) covering core academic search and basic literature review
Heavier Deep Research and AI Mentor usage; check website for current tiers and limits
Discounted student and institutional access — contact for details
One plan carries no published number: Student / Institutional, recorded as “Custom”. Nothing is estimated in its place. The vendor's own pricing page is the only source for those figures.
Pricing on this page has not been re-verified. The entry was last edited on , and no separate pricing check has been run since. Treat the figures as a record of what was published then and confirm on the official site.
Is Bohrium worth it?
Worth it for Researchers, postdocs, and faculty in the physical and life sciences who need citation-traceable literature synthesis plus scientific computing tools.
You can test that on the free tier before paying anything. The recorded trade-offs are listed below, and any one of them can settle the question on its own.
The 8/10 AI Score is an editorial read of published capability, price and shipping pace. Nobody here has hands-on hours with Bohrium. How we verify.
Worth it if
The strengths recorded against this entry.
- Citation traceability to real papers — output you can actually cite, not hallucinated references
- Searches a large 170M+ paper corpus with semantic, not just keyword, matching
- Combines literature review, knowledge bases, and scientific computing in one platform
- Usable free tier with daily credits, plus student and institutional pricing
- Backed by DP Technology, an established AI-for-science firm with real research traction
Not worth it if
Any one of these blocks your use case.
- Coverage skews toward physical and life sciences where DP Technology is strongest
- AI-generated reviews still require expert verification before any serious use
- Crowded category — overlaps heavily with Elicit, Consensus, and SciSpace
- Pricing tiers and credit limits are not always clearly documented; verify on the site
What sets Bohrium apart
- Deep Research output traces every claim back to a real paper
- Semantic search across a 170M+ paper corpus
- Combines literature review, knowledge bases, and scientific computing tools
- Backed by DP Technology, reporting 300,000+ researchers across 100+ universities
Key features
Citation-Traceable Search
Semantic search over a corpus of 170M+ papers where every answer traces back to a real, locatable source — the key guard against the fabricated references that plague general chatbots.
Deep Research Writer
An AI literature-review and Deep Research mode that drafts structured, sourced syntheses from the question you pose, rather than a loose summary you have to re-check.
Knowledge Bases
Build personal collections of papers and notes the assistant can reason over, so research context persists across sessions instead of starting cold each time.
Scientific Computing Tools
A set of computing utilities reflecting DP Technology's DeepModeling roots, extending the platform beyond literature into the actual scientific workflow.
How it compares
| Tool | Best for | Pricing | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bohrium | Researchers, postdocs, and faculty in the physical and life sciences who need citation-traceable literature synthesis plus scientific computing tools. | Free tier (daily credits) + Pro from ~$15/mo | 8/10 |
| Perplexity AI vs Perplexity AI → | Knowledge workers and researchers who want cited, synthesized answers instead of a list of links to click through. | Freemium | 9.4/10 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | — | $0.75 per million input tokens, $3.75 per million output tokens | 9.2/10 |
| NotebookLM vs NotebookLM → | Students, researchers, and professionals who need answers grounded strictly in the specific documents they upload. | Free | 9.1/10 |
Compare head-to-head
Comparison explorer Put Bohrium up against any three tools Opens with Bohrium already loaded. Add up to three more from the full index and read pricing, features, pros and cons in one table. →Related reading
Mistral €3bn Round Meets OpenAI Wiki Disclosure
Mistral closed a €3bn round above €21bn valuation while OpenAI outlined next steps on agent misalignment reporting from its recent incident.
Mistral Closes €3B Series D at €21B Valuation
Mistral raised €3 billion in Europe's largest tech equity round, led by Samsung at a post-money valuation above €21 billion, to expand sovereign open-weight
Claude 13 Million Line Lean Code Audited
Anthropic September 4 post records Claude writing 13 million lines of Lean code for Fermat’s Last Theorem formalization over 11 days. Audit covers source
Ready to try Bohrium?
Head to the official site to start with Bohrium — pricing and plans are listed above.
Visit Bohrium