Coding · Head-to-head
Windsurf vs Amazon Q Developer
Windsurf (freemium, AI Score 7.2/10) vs Amazon Q Developer (freemium, AI Score 7.9/10). Side-by-side pricing, features, pros and cons, and which to pick.
The verdict
Pick Windsurf if…
- →your primary use case is developers already productive in windsurf's cascade workflow who have no urgent reason to migrate, and teams evaluating cognition's stack who want an editor-side agent sitting alongside devin's cloud agents.
Pick Amazon Q Developer if…
- →overall capability matters more than price (AI Score 7.9 vs 7.2)
- →your primary use case is platform and backend teams already running on aws who need legacy java, .net or mainframe migrations automated, and who want an assistant that can query live account resources rather than only the repository.
- →you need: productivity
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Windsurf | Amazon Q Developer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Headline pricing | Free tier; paid plans from $20/mo (the Devin lineup now served at windsurf.com) — verify before buying | Free tier + Pro $19/user/mo |
| Free tier | Yes, but it is credit-metered and is Devin's free tier, not the unlimited-basic-completions-forever tier this entry once described. That tier no longer exists. Confirm current allowances on the live pricing page before relying on it. | Usable free tier accessible with only an AWS Builder ID — no AWS account or card required — covering chat, inline suggestions and security scanning under monthly request quotas. |
| AI Score | 7.2/10 | 7.9/10 |
| Best for | Developers already productive in Windsurf's Cascade workflow who have no urgent reason to migrate, and teams evaluating Cognition's stack who want an editor-side agent sitting alongside Devin's cloud agents. | Platform and backend teams already running on AWS who need legacy Java, .NET or mainframe migrations automated, and who want an assistant that can query live account resources rather than only the repository. |
| Editor's pick | — | — |
| Use cases | development agents | development agents productivity |
| Date added | 2025-06-01 | 2026-05-01 |
Pros and cons
Windsurf
Coding · freemium
Pros
- ✓Cascade remains one of the better-designed agent loops: it plans, edits across files, runs commands, reads output and iterates without needing constant re-prompting
- ✓Repo-wide indexing means the agent locates the relevant files itself instead of making you paste context
- ✓Mixes cheap in-house SWE-series models for routine edits with frontier models for hard problems, so agent runs are not uniformly expensive
- ✓Enterprise self-hosted and air-gapped deployment with zero data retention, which Cursor does not offer at any tier
- ✓Full VS Code fork with terminal execution and file-write access, not a chat sidebar bolted onto an editor
Cons
- ×The founding team including CEO Varun Mohan left for Google DeepMind in July 2025 and Cognition bought what remained, so an independent product roadmap is not a safe assumption
- ×windsurf.com resolved to Cognition's Devin site when checked on 2026-08-10, meaning the plans a buyer actually encounters are Devin's and no Windsurf-branded price could be confirmed on any live page
- ×Cursor and Claude Code have caught up on multi-file agentic work, erasing the 2025 lead this entry's original 9.1 score was built on
- ×Pricing is credit-metered and hard to forecast for a team; the unlimited free tier that once made the product an easy recommendation is gone
Amazon Q Developer
Coding · freemium
Pros
- ✓Transformation agents cover legacy migrations — Java versions, .NET Framework, mainframe COBOL, VMware — that no general-purpose coding assistant attempts
- ✓Works against live AWS account resources from the Console and CLI, not just files in a repository
- ✓Free tier needs only an AWS Builder ID, so it can be evaluated without an AWS account or a card
- ✓Pro includes IP indemnification for generated suggestions, which matters to legal review at larger companies
- ✓CLI agent supports MCP servers, so it plugs into the same tool ecosystem as rival agents
Cons
- ×Code generation and agent quality trail Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Copilot agent mode for everyday application work
- ×AWS now sells Kiro as a separate agentic IDE, leaving two overlapping products and real ambiguity about Q Developer's roadmap priority
- ×Most of the value evaporates if your infrastructure is not on AWS
- ×Free-tier request quotas have been revised repeatedly, making the free experience hard to plan around
Related comparisons
Updated 2026-08-10. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.