Coding · Head-to-head
Amazon Q Developer vs Cody
Amazon Q Developer vs Cody: Free tier + Pro $19/user/mo vs Free tier + Pro $9/mo + Enterprise custom. Side-by-side features, pricing, and which to pick.
The verdict
Pick Amazon Q Developer if…
- →your primary use case is development teams building on aws who need code generation, security scanning, and infrastructure help across their ide, console, and cli.
- →you need: productivity
Pick Cody if…
- →your primary use case is development teams who want an ai coding assistant that reasons over their entire codebase and multiple repositories, not just the open file.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Amazon Q Developer | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Headline pricing | Free tier + Pro $19/user/mo | Free tier + Pro $9/mo + Enterprise custom |
| Free tier | Generous free tier with code completion, chat, and 50 security scans per month | Autocomplete, chat, and commands with usage limits |
| AI Score | 8.8/10 | 8.6/10 |
| Best for | Development teams building on AWS who need code generation, security scanning, and infrastructure help across their IDE, console, and CLI. | Development teams who want an AI coding assistant that reasons over their entire codebase and multiple repositories, not just the open file. |
| Editor's pick | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Use cases | development productivity | development |
| Date added | 2026-05-01 | 2026-05-01 |
Pros and cons
Amazon Q Developer
Coding · freemium
Pros
- ✓Unmatched AWS integration — understands cloud infrastructure, not just application code
- ✓Generous free tier with real functionality including security scanning
- ✓Code transformation automates painful language and framework upgrades
- ✓Works across IDE, AWS Console, and CLI for a unified experience
Cons
- ×Much less useful if you're not building on AWS
- ×Code completion quality trails GitHub Copilot and Cursor for general-purpose coding
- ×IDE plugin can feel slower than competitors for inline suggestions
- ×Transformation feature currently limited to Java and .NET upgrades
Cody
Coding · freemium
Pros
- ✓Codebase context understands your full repo, not just the open file
- ✓Multi-model support lets you pick the right LLM for each task
- ✓Works as a VS Code and JetBrains extension — no need to switch editors
- ✓Enterprise tier integrates with Sourcegraph code search across multiple repositories
Cons
- ×Context engine is most capable on Enterprise tier — free users get limited repo-wide context
- ×Lacks the autonomous agent and multi-file editing capabilities of Cursor or Windsurf
- ×Autocomplete quality lags behind GitHub Copilot and Cursor in head-to-head comparisons
- ×Sourcegraph integration adds complexity to enterprise setup and onboarding
Related comparisons
Updated 2026-05-01. Spec data sourced from official product pages and tracked in our public directory at /tools.